|
Posted in Unspecified
Is it not unjust that little Suzie has sex with her boyfriend five times a week and gets off scot free, whereas Joe gets branded a man-whore because he brought someone home from the bar one time? After two months without sex?
Should those men and women who currently aren’t in Hard Core Porn relationships be punished for having a sex drive? Banished to the whore dungeon in shame? Are singles expected to deny their natural desires until a stable partnership transpires? What if that takes years? Would it satisfy everyone if Joe went out and found some girlfriend just to have someone to fuck on a regular basis instead?
What’s the actual definition of “slut” / “man-whore”? Isn’t it more like a mathematical problem? Sleeps with ____ people in ____ amount of time = slut. What about, sleeps with steady partner _____ times and enjoys it ____ times = avoids being called a slut/manwhore? Does that matter?
What’s the opposite of man-whore? Failed heterosexual? What’s the opposite of “slut”? Prude, obviously, which is equally unfair.
We should invent new ones. How about, “fear-based sexual Adult hard Porn repression”, or “desperately seeking validation and affection”?
The word “slut” should just be abolished. It’s dumb. It’s outdated and irrelevant. It should became tactless and offensive, as other discriminating words from the past have.
Of course there are different “styles” when it comes to single sexual behavior.
You know how sometimes if you’re starving and drunk and it’s 3am you’ll hit up McDonalds, but you wouldn’t be caught dead there in any waking hour? Well, like some people I know, both male and female, will sleep with pretty much anyone if they’re feeling particularly sexually starved that evening. Others are more picky about the level of connection and attraction. Not that one attitude is necessarily less deserving of respect than the other.
06:49 - 2012-Jan-3 -
|
Information
XXX Real Porno
|
